Towards an Axiom System for Default Logic
نویسندگان
چکیده
Recently, Lakemeyer and Levesque proposed a logic of onlyknowing which precisely captures three forms of nonmonotonic reasoning: Moore’s Autoepistemic Logic, Konolige’s variant based on moderately grounded expansions, and Reiter’s default logic. Defaults have a uniform representation under all three interpretations in the new logic. Moreover, the logic itself is monotonic, that is, nonmonotonic reasoning is cast in terms of validity in the classical sense. While Lakemeyer and Levesque gave a model-theoretic account of their logic, a proof-theoretic characterization remained open. This paper fills that gap for the propositional subset: a sound and complete axiom system in the new logic for all three varieties of default reasoning. We also present formal derivations for some examples of default reasoning. Finally we present evidence that it is unlikely that a complete axiom system exists in the first-order case, even when restricted to the simplest forms of default reasoning.
منابع مشابه
Rule Calculus: Semantics, Axioms and Applications
We consider the problem of how a default rule can be deduced from a default theory. For this purpose, we propose an axiom system which precisely captures the deductive reasoning about default rules. We show that our axiomatic system is sound and complete under the semantics of the logic of here-and-there. We also study other important properties such as substitution and monotonicity of our syst...
متن کاملDefault Reasoning about Spatial Occupancy
This paper describes a default reasoning problem, analogous to the frame problem, that arises when an attempt is made to construct a logic-based calculus for reasoning about the movement of objects in a real-valued co-ordinate system. A number of potential solutions to this problem are examined. Particular attention is given to the interaction between the default reasoning required by these sol...
متن کاملTowards Axiomatic Basis of Inductive Inference
The language for the formulation of the interesting statements is, of course, most important. We use first order predicate logic. Our main achievement in this paper is an axiom system which we believe to be more powerful than any other natural general purpose discovery axiom system. We prove soundness of this axiom system in this paper. Additionally we prove that if we remove some of the requir...
متن کاملOnly-Knowing Meets Nonmonotonic Modal Logic
Only-knowing was originally introduced by Levesque to capture the beliefs of an agent in the sense that its knowledge base is all the agent knows. When a knowledge base contains defaults Levesque also showed an exact correspondence between only-knowing and autoepistemic logic. Later these results were extended by Lakemeyer and Levesque to also capture a variant of autoepistemic logic proposed b...
متن کامل1987-Curing Anomalous Extensions
In a recent paper, Hanks and McDermott presented a simple problem in temporal reasoning which showed that a seemingly natural representation of a frame axiom in nonmonotonic logic can give rise to an anomalous extension, i.e., one which is counter-intuitive in that it does not appear to be supported by the known facts. An alternative, less formal approach to nonmonotonic reasoning uses the mech...
متن کامل